blFabrizio Blacksmith Presente

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente

@blacksmith993

Ita✈️🏠Uk Metal vocalist Voice Talent @ Monster Factory ⬇️

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente là nhà sáng tạo TikTok với 25K người theo dõi và 285.2K lượt thích. Mỗi video có trung bình 275.4K lượt xem, tỷ lệ tương tác 11.0%. Hashtag dùng nhiều nhất: #duet, #voiceactingchallenge và #voiceacting.

https://linktr.ee/blacksmith93
25K
Người theo dõi
426
Đang theo dõi
285.2K
Lượt thích
275.4K
Lượt xem TB
Tỷ lệ tương tác: 11.0% Vương quốc Anh 🗣️ Tiếng Anh
25K
Người theo dõi
285.2K
Tổng lượt thích
275.4K
Lượt xem TB
104
Video
426
Đang theo dõi
0
Lượt lưu
11.0%
Tỷ lệ tương tác

Tăng trưởng & Dự báo

Cập nhật lần cuốiDự báo 7 ngàyDự báo 30 ngày
Người theo dõi25K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Tổng lượt thích285.2K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Video104🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Lượt xem TB275.4K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

Mở khóa báo cáo đầy đủ

Email liên hệ, lịch sử tăng trưởng và dự báo, cùng toàn bộ kho video có trong gói Pro.

Xem báo cáo đầy đủ →

Gói Pro miễn phí trong giai đoạn beta: dùng thử ngay, không cần thẻ tín dụng.

Thu nhập ước tính

Giá ước tính cho mỗi bài quảng cáo: $125 đến $625, tính theo khoảng 5 đến 25 USD cho mỗi 1.000 người theo dõi. Đây là ước tính dựa trên quy mô khán giả, không phải thu nhập đã công bố.

Cập nhật lần cuối:

Hồ sơ TikTok

Video gần đây

Video mới nhất: 2026-09-10

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice
▶
▶ 350 ❤ 0 💬 0

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge
▶
▶ 144 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️
▶
▶ 164 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente có bao nhiêu người theo dõi?

Tính đến 2026-10-29, Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente (@blacksmith993) có 25K người theo dõi trên TikTok.

Nhà sáng tạo tương tự

Top nhà sáng tạo TikTok #duet tại Vương quốc Anh

Xem tất cả →