blFabrizio Blacksmith Presente

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente

@blacksmith993

Ita✈️🏠Uk Metal vocalist Voice Talent @ Monster Factory ⬇️

Fabrizio Blacksmith PresenteはTikTokクリエイターで、フォロワー25K、いいね285.2K。動画の平均再生数は275.4K回、エンゲージメント率は11.0%です。よく使うハッシュタグ:#duet、#voiceactingchallengeと#voiceacting。

https://linktr.ee/blacksmith93
25K
フォロワー
426
フォロー中
285.2K
いいね
275.4K
平均再生数
エンゲージメント率: 11.0% イギリス 🗣️ 英語
25K
フォロワー
285.2K
いいね合計
275.4K
平均再生数
104
動画
426
フォロー中
0
お気に入り
11.0%
エンゲージメント率

成長と予測

最終更新7日間予測30日間予測
フォロワー25K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
いいね合計285.2K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
動画104🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
平均再生数275.4K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

完全版レポートを解除

連絡先メール、成長履歴と予測、全動画アーカイブはProでご利用いただけます。

完全版レポートを見る →

ベータ期間中はProが無料。クレジットカード不要でお試しいただけます。

推定収益

タイアップ投稿1件あたりの推定単価:$125〜$625(フォロワー1,000人あたり約5〜25ドルで計算)。オーディエンス規模からの推定であり、公表された収入ではありません。

最終更新:

TikTokプロフィール

最近の動画

最新の動画:2026-09-10

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice
▶
▶ 350 ❤ 0 💬 0

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge
▶
▶ 144 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️
▶
▶ 164 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️

よくある質問

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presenteのフォロワー数は?

2026-10-29時点で、Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente(@blacksmith993)のTikTokフォロワーは25Kです。

似ているクリエイター

イギリスの#duetの人気TikTokクリエイターランキング

すべて見る →