blFabrizio Blacksmith Presente

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente

@blacksmith993

Ita✈️🏠Uk Metal vocalist Voice Talent @ Monster Factory ⬇️

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente adalah kreator TikTok dengan 25K pengikut dan 285.2K like. Videonya rata-rata ditonton 275.4K kali, dengan tingkat engagement 11.0%. Hashtag yang paling sering dipakai: #duet, #voiceactingchallenge dan #voiceacting.

https://linktr.ee/blacksmith93
25K
Pengikut
426
Mengikuti
285.2K
Like
275.4K
Rata-rata tayangan
Engagement: 11.0% Inggris Raya 🗣️ Inggris
25K
Pengikut
285.2K
Total like
275.4K
Rata-rata tayangan
104
Video
426
Mengikuti
0
Favorit
11.0%
Engagement

Pertumbuhan & Prediksi

Terakhir diperbaruiPrediksi 7 hariPrediksi 30 hari
Pengikut25K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Total like285.2K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Video104🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Rata-rata tayangan275.4K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

Buka laporan lengkap

Email kontak, riwayat pertumbuhan dan prediksi, serta arsip video lengkap tersedia di Pro.

Lihat laporan lengkap →

Pro gratis selama beta: mulai uji coba, tanpa kartu kredit.

Perkiraan penghasilan

Perkiraan tarif per postingan berbayar: $125 hingga $625, dengan asumsi sekitar 5 sampai 25 dolar per 1.000 pengikut. Ini hanya perkiraan dari ukuran audiens, bukan penghasilan yang dilaporkan.

Terakhir diperbarui:

Profil TikTok

Video terbaru

Video terbaru: 2026-09-10

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice
▶
▶ 350 ❤ 0 💬 0

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge
▶
▶ 144 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️
▶
▶ 164 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️

Pertanyaan yang sering diajukan

Berapa jumlah pengikut Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente?

Per 2026-10-29, Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente (@blacksmith993) memiliki 25K pengikut TikTok.

Kreator serupa

Top kreator TikTok #duet di Inggris Raya

Lihat semua →