blFabrizio Blacksmith Presente

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente

@blacksmith993

Ita✈️🏠Uk Metal vocalist Voice Talent @ Monster Factory ⬇️

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente صانع محتوى على تيك توك، لديه 25K متابع و285.2K إعجاب. يحصد كل فيديو في المتوسط 275.4K مشاهدة، بمعدل تفاعل 11.0%. أكثر الوسوم استخدامًا: #duet، #voiceactingchallenge و#voiceacting.

https://linktr.ee/blacksmith93
25K
المتابعون
426
يتابع
285.2K
الإعجابات
275.4K
متوسط المشاهدات
معدل التفاعل: 11.0% المملكة المتحدة 🗣️ الإنجليزية
25K
المتابعون
285.2K
إجمالي الإعجابات
275.4K
متوسط المشاهدات
104
الفيديوهات
426
يتابع
0
المفضلة
11.0%
معدل التفاعل

النمو والتوقعات

آخر تحديثتوقع 7 أيامتوقع 30 يومًا
المتابعون25K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
إجمالي الإعجابات285.2K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
الفيديوهات104🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
متوسط المشاهدات275.4K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

افتح التقرير الكامل

البريد الإلكتروني للتواصل وسجل النمو والتوقعات وأرشيف الفيديو الكامل متاحة في Pro.

عرض التقرير الكامل →

Pro مجاني خلال الفترة التجريبية: ابدأ التجربة دون بطاقة ائتمان.

الأرباح التقديرية

السعر التقديري للمنشور الإعلاني الواحد: من $125 إلى $625، بناءً على نحو 5 إلى 25 دولارًا لكل 1000 متابع. هذا تقدير مبني على حجم الجمهور وليس دخلًا مُعلنًا.

آخر تحديث:

حساب تيك توك

أحدث الفيديوهات

أحدث فيديو: 2026-09-10

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice
▶
▶ 350 ❤ 0 💬 0

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge
▶
▶ 144 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️
▶
▶ 164 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️

الأسئلة الشائعة

كم عدد متابعي Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente؟

حتى 2026-10-29، لدى Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente (@blacksmith993) 25K متابع على تيك توك.

صناع محتوى مشابهون

أفضل صناع محتوى تيك توك #duet في المملكة المتحدة

عرض الكل →