blFabrizio Blacksmith Presente

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente

@blacksmith993

Ita✈️🏠Uk Metal vocalist Voice Talent @ Monster Factory ⬇️

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente, bir TikTok içerik üreticisi: 25K takipçi, 285.2K beğeni. Videoları ortalama 275.4K izlenme alıyor; etkileşim oranı 11.0%. En çok kullanılan etiketler: #duet, #voiceactingchallenge ve #voiceacting.

https://linktr.ee/blacksmith93
25K
Takipçi
426
Takip
285.2K
Beğeni
275.4K
Ort. izlenme
Etkileşim: 11.0% Birleşik Krallık 🗣️ İngilizce
25K
Takipçi
285.2K
Toplam beğeni
275.4K
Ort. izlenme
104
Video
426
Takip
0
Favori
11.0%
Etkileşim

Büyüme ve tahmin

Son güncelleme7 günlük tahmin30 günlük tahmin
Takipçi25K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Toplam beğeni285.2K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Video104🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Ort. izlenme275.4K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

Tam raporun kilidini açın

İletişim e-postası, büyüme geçmişi ve tahminler ile tüm video arşivi Pro'ya dahildir.

Tam raporu görüntüle →

Beta süresince Pro ücretsiz: kredi kartı gerekmeden denemeye başlayın.

Tahmini kazanç

Sponsorlu gönderi başına tahmini ücret: $125 ile $625 arası; 1.000 takipçi başına yaklaşık 5–25 dolar esas alınmıştır. Bu, kitle büyüklüğüne dayalı bir tahmindir, beyan edilmiş gelir değildir.

Son güncelleme:

TikTok profili

Son videolar

Son video: 2026-09-10

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice
▶
▶ 350 ❤ 0 💬 0

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge
▶
▶ 144 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️
▶
▶ 164 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️

Sık sorulan sorular

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente kaç takipçiye sahip?

2026-10-29 itibarıyla Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente (@blacksmith993) hesabının TikTok'ta 25K takipçisi var.

Benzer içerik üreticileri

(Birleşik Krallık) en iyi TikTok içerik üreticileri #duet

Tümünü gör →