blFabrizio Blacksmith Presente

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente

@blacksmith993

Ita✈️🏠Uk Metal vocalist Voice Talent @ Monster Factory ⬇️

Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente ialah pencipta kandungan TikTok dengan 25K pengikut dan 285.2K suka. Videonya mendapat purata 275.4K tontonan, dengan kadar penglibatan 11.0%. Hashtag paling kerap digunakan: #duet, #voiceactingchallenge dan #voiceacting.

https://linktr.ee/blacksmith93
25K
Pengikut
426
Mengikuti
285.2K
Suka
275.4K
Purata tontonan
Penglibatan: 11.0% United Kingdom 🗣️ Inggeris
25K
Pengikut
285.2K
Jumlah suka
275.4K
Purata tontonan
104
Video
426
Mengikuti
0
Kegemaran
11.0%
Penglibatan

Pertumbuhan & Ramalan

Kemas kini terakhirRamalan 7 hariRamalan 30 hari
Pengikut25K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Jumlah suka285.2K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Video104🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
Purata tontonan275.4K🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

Buka laporan penuh

E-mel hubungan, sejarah pertumbuhan dan ramalan, serta arkib video penuh tersedia dalam Pro.

Lihat laporan penuh →

Pro percuma sepanjang beta: mulakan percubaan, tanpa kad kredit.

Anggaran pendapatan

Anggaran kadar bagi setiap hantaran penajaan: $125 hingga $625, berdasarkan kira-kira 5 hingga 25 dolar bagi setiap 1,000 pengikut. Ini anggaran berdasarkan saiz audiens, bukan pendapatan yang dilaporkan.

Kemas kini terakhir:

Profil TikTok

Video terkini

Video terbaharu: 2026-09-10

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice
▶
▶ 350 ❤ 0 💬 0

A thing I keep seeing in conversations about gendered violence is the idea that if patriarchy were the cause, most men would be violent. That assumption is flawed. Systems don’t work like switches. They don’t produce identical outcomes in everyone. Patriarchy doesn’t “turn men violent”. It structures probabilities, permissions, and justifications. Most men aren’t violent, and that doesn’t contradict patriarchy at all. It actually fits how systems operate. The real question isn’t “why aren’t all men violent?” It’s “why is violence so disproportionately male, and why does it so often follow patterns of entitlement, control, and punishment toward women?” Individual factors explain who becomes violent: trauma, insecurity, emotional regulation, perceived loss of status. But culture explains how that violence is expressed, who it’s directed at, and how much society excuses or minimises it. Patriarchy doesn’t create anger. It tells men when anger is justified, who it can be taken out on, and when it should be excused. That’s why violence doesn’t need to be universal to be structural. A system doesn’t need to make most people violent to be responsible for violence. It only needs to decide whose aggression is legitimised, whose fear is dismissed, and whose suffering is normalised. That’s where patriarchy operates. Calling this a “men problem” isn’t about saying men are inherently bad. It’s about responsibility. Patriarchy was built by men, benefits men as a group, and is still largely upheld by men, consciously or unconsciously. Men can be harmed by patriarchy and still benefit from it. Those things coexist. But women experience the worst outcomes. That asymmetry matters. So when people say “all men until no men”, I don’t hear “men are the enemy”. I hear “patriarchy until no patriarchy”. If men don’t actively dismantle what advantages them, they will keep reproducing the same violence they claim to oppose. #MensGrowth #AccountabilityWork #UnlearningPatriarchy #HealthyMasculinity #GenderJustice

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge
▶
▶ 144 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Abigail Carey #voiceactingchallenge

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️
▶
▶ 164 ❤ 0 💬 0

#duet with @Terence Davis Voice Acting #voiceactingchallenge i messed up the last group of lines but hey, first take, and I love it ❤️

Soalan lazim

Berapa ramai pengikut Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente?

Setakat 2026-10-29, Fabrizio Blacksmith Presente (@blacksmith993) mempunyai 25K pengikut TikTok.

Pencipta kandungan serupa

Top pencipta kandungan TikTok #duet di United Kingdom

Lihat semua →