stAustin Starks — Trading & Tech

Austin Starks — Trading & Tech

@starkstechnology

Algorithmic trading is easier than you think... and for a limited time, it's free 👇

Austin Starks — Trading & Tech은(는) 틱톡 크리에이터로, 팔로워 9.3K, 좋아요 590.6K입니다. 동영상 평균 조회수는 6.3K회, 참여율은 2.0%입니다. 자주 쓰는 해시태그: #aitrading, #stitch 및 #swe.

https://nexustrade.io/tiktok
9.3K
팔로워
283
팔로잉
590.6K
좋아요
6.3K
평균 조회수
참여율: 2.0% 미국 🗣️ 영어
9.3K
팔로워
590.6K
총 좋아요
6.3K
평균 조회수
3.2K
동영상
283
팔로잉
0
즐겨찾기
2.0%
참여율

성장 및 예측

마지막 업데이트7일 예측30일 예측
팔로워9.3K▲ 🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
총 좋아요590.6K▲ 🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
동영상3.2K▲ 🔒 Pro🔒 Pro
평균 조회수6.3K▼ 🔒 Pro🔒 Pro

전체 리포트 잠금 해제

연락처 이메일, 성장 기록과 예측, 전체 동영상 아카이브는 Pro에서 제공됩니다.

전체 리포트 보기 →

베타 기간에는 Pro가 무료입니다. 신용카드 없이 체험을 시작하세요.

마지막 업데이트:

틱톡 프로필

최근 동영상

최신 영상: 2026-10-24

You won’t stop me from generating AI art or writing code with AI
▶
▶ 837 ❤ 0 💬 0

You won’t stop me from generating AI art or writing code with AI

Replying to @jsfinancials If you’re using “vibe-coding” in the loosest definition, i.e. using AI to guide the process of designing and implementing software, then yes, the app is vibe-coded.  However, if you’re using the canonical definition… using AI to remove all critical thinking and blindly accepting what Claude says, then it’s just not true.  I have: 1. Posts on my LinkedIn profile  2. Posts on my GitHub profile 3. Posts on Medium That all describe what I was building BEFORE AI came out. The design, including the strategy abstraction (arguably my most important design decision) and the event-driven architecture (which fundamentally solves inherent issues with retail backtesting platform like lookahead bias) verifiably came before ChatGPT existed.  There’s a reason why I’m so defensive about this. I’ve been obsessed with this problem for over 6 years, since I was a graduate student at Carnegie Mellon. I put more effort into this than 99% of people put into their careers. Ive done research in deep reinforcement learning for stock trading. I have literally tens of thousands of commits **this year alone**. And then people take one look at it and conclude it’s vibe-coded? No. That’s complete bullshit.  and the distinction matters. “Vibe-coded” software is inherently not trustworthy. If you’re risking $40,000 (like I am) on fully autonomous trading bot, you’re going to want someone to know how the underlying software works.  So I refute the vibe-coded claims wholly and unequivocally. It’s outright verifiably not true.  #vibecoding #algotrading #aitrading
▶
▶ 1K ❤ 0 💬 0

Replying to @jsfinancials If you’re using “vibe-coding” in the loosest definition, i.e. using AI to guide the process of designing and implementing software, then yes, the app is vibe-coded. However, if you’re using the canonical definition… using AI to remove all critical thinking and blindly accepting what Claude says, then it’s just not true. I have: 1. Posts on my LinkedIn profile 2. Posts on my GitHub profile 3. Posts on Medium That all describe what I was building BEFORE AI came out. The design, including the strategy abstraction (arguably my most important design decision) and the event-driven architecture (which fundamentally solves inherent issues with retail backtesting platform like lookahead bias) verifiably came before ChatGPT existed. There’s a reason why I’m so defensive about this. I’ve been obsessed with this problem for over 6 years, since I was a graduate student at Carnegie Mellon. I put more effort into this than 99% of people put into their careers. Ive done research in deep reinforcement learning for stock trading. I have literally tens of thousands of commits **this year alone**. And then people take one look at it and conclude it’s vibe-coded? No. That’s complete bullshit. and the distinction matters. “Vibe-coded” software is inherently not trustworthy. If you’re risking $40,000 (like I am) on fully autonomous trading bot, you’re going to want someone to know how the underlying software works. So I refute the vibe-coded claims wholly and unequivocally. It’s outright verifiably not true. #vibecoding #algotrading #aitrading

I filtered the 10 biggest US stocks down to the ones with positive news. Same 250.8% return, and the 2022 loss dropped from 37.9% to 18.9%. Then I flipped it to negative news and 2022 still got cut almost in half. Holding the top 20 with no news at all had the smallest drop of any version. The smoother ride came from owning more companies. #StockMarket #Investing #AITrading #NexusTrade
▶
▶ 664 ❤ 0 💬 0

I filtered the 10 biggest US stocks down to the ones with positive news. Same 250.8% return, and the 2022 loss dropped from 37.9% to 18.9%. Then I flipped it to negative news and 2022 still got cut almost in half. Holding the top 20 with no news at all had the smallest drop of any version. The smoother ride came from owning more companies. #StockMarket #Investing #AITrading #NexusTrade

자주 묻는 질문

Austin Starks — Trading & Tech의 팔로워는 몇 명인가요?

2026-10-24 기준 Austin Starks — Trading & Tech(@starkstechnology)의 TikTok 팔로워는 9.3K명입니다.

비슷한 크리에이터

미국 인기 틱톡 크리에이터 순위

모두 보기 →
charli d’amelio @charlidamelio
#2

orca enthusiast meg thee stallion fan i post on youtube on saturdays (for the most part)

팔로워
160.4M
좋아요
12.4B
조회수
3.6M
참여율
2.3%
TikTok @tiktok
#3

Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok.

팔로워
96.4M
좋아요
465.3M
조회수
534K
참여율
0.3%
Bella Poarch @bellapoarch
#4

Picnic At The Cemetery

팔로워
91.5M
좋아요
2.4B
조회수
2.2M
참여율
17.5%
Kimberly Loaiza @kimberly.loaiza
#7

Hola linduras ✨ Únete al grupo 👇🏻

팔로워
83.4M
좋아요
4.3B
조회수
5.9M
참여율
2.3%