workingmamabling💎💎💎

▶

▶ 1.7K ❤ 0 💬 0

WHERE IS THE MEDIA? WHERE IS THE ACCOUNTABILITY? FAMILY COURT IS SUPPOSED TO PROTECT FAMILIES — NOT INTENSIFY THE CONDITIONS IN WHICH FAMILIES DIE. I STARTED LOOKING AT FAMILY-COURT-RELATED DEATHS IN TEXAS, AND THE FURTHER DOWN THIS RABBIT HOLE I GO, THE MORE DISTURBING THE QUESTION BECOMES: WHERE ARE THE MAJOR NEWS NETWORKS? WHERE IS THE INVESTIGATION INTO WHAT HAPPENS BEFORE THESE FAMILIES END UP DEAD? The statewide numbers alone are staggering. In 2024 and 2025, 321 Texans were killed by intimate partners — 161 in 2024 and another 160 in 2025. In 2024, 104 minor children lost a parent to these homicides. In 2025, another 128 minor children lost one or both parents. What was happening in these families before the deaths? How many were simultaneously involved in divorce, custody litigation, protective-order proceedings, possession disputes, coercive-control allegations, domestic-violence proceedings, or other court intervention? What orders were entered? What warnings were presented? What evidence was rejected? Who was believed? Who wasn’t? Did an order reduce the danger — or intensify an already volatile situation? These are not merely case numbers. THEY ARE PEOPLE. THEY ARE PARENTS. THEY ARE CHILDREN. #familycourtcorruption #judicialaccountability #judicialmisconduct #familycourtcrisis #protectourchildren

▶

▶ 422 ❤ 0 💬 0

October 7 changed something in Jewish families across the world. We watched in horror as families were murdered, women were assaulted, children and grandparents were taken hostage, and people were dragged into Gaza—some into an underground world from which many would never return. Tonight I will light a Yahrzeit candle for those who were lost. That grief crossed an ocean into my own family, and ultimately into my divorce. Instead of being understood as grief, trauma, Jewish identity, and advocacy, it was recast as pathology: “Claudia’s mental decline began on October 7, 2023. She has become obsessed with Israel.” Those words have had consequences far beyond rhetoric. I was compelled into an approximately $18,000 psychiatric assessment, yet the resulting evaluation did not find me suicidal or a danger to myself or anyone else. October 7 devastated me because I am Jewish and because what happened was devastating. Grieving murdered Jews, fearing for hostages, and advocating for Israel are not psychiatric symptoms. They are not proof of parental unfitness. Jewish grief the Supreme Court has expressly recognized Jews as an ancestral/ethnic group protected by the Reconstruction-era civil-rights laws, while the Fourteenth and First Amendments independently protect against state discrimination based on ancestry and religion. Jewish identity is not merely a matter of private religious belief. In Shaare Tefila Congregation v. Cobb, 481 U.S. 615 (1987), the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that Jews are among the peoples Congress intended to protect from racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 because of their shared ancestry and ethnic characteristics. The companion case, Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji, held that § 1981 protects identifiable groups subjected to intentional discrimination because of ancestry or ethnic characteristics. The Court has also recognized that state discrimination based on ancestry implicates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment So when a divorce record says, “Claudia’s mental decline began on October 7, 2023” and that she became “obsessed with Israel,” the question is not merely whether those words were insulting. The question is whether a protected Jewish identity and a Jewish response to the mass murder and hostage-taking of Jews were used as proxies for mental illness in state judicial proceedings. #Nova #october7 #Israel #Jewish #familycourtcorruption

▶

▶ 4K ❤ 0 💬 0

FRAUD ON THE COURT. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT. AND THE IMMINENT LOSS OF NEARLY HALF A MILLION DOLLARS. For almost two years, I have been fighting to protect my constitutional rights, my relationship with my child, and my property. But what happened to my home deserves particular scrutiny. On April 29, 2025, opposing counsel, David Hoffmann, obtained an ex parte Temporary Restraining Order, presenting allegations that I was suicidal and mentally unstable, while seeking extraordinary control over my personal and financial affairs. That application included demands concerning my power of attorney, a compelled psychiatric evaluation, restrictions involving my child, and the sale of my home. Think about that. Allegations concerning my mental health were used to seek control over my property. I disputed those allegations, and subsequent psychiatric evidence did not substantiate claims that I was suicidal or a danger to anyone. The initial attempt did not achieve the ultimate sale of my home. SO WHAT HAPPENED NEXT? In August 2025, I retained attorney Daniel Clanton. I specifically warned him that my home was at risk of foreclosure and needed to be sold urgently. I was not resisting a sale. I had already pursued selling the property. I WAS TRYING TO PROTECT ALMOST $500,000 OF MY PERSONAL INVESTMENT. Then came the December 8, 2025, “Agreed Order for Sale.” Except there was one enormous problem. I NEVER AGREED TO THE ORDER THAT WAS ENTERED. I had agreed to an earlier version supplied by my attorney. A materially different version was subsequently transmitted without clearly identifying the changes or obtaining my informed consent. The attorneys involved were my own counsel, Daniel Clanton, and opposing counsel, David Hoffmann. I contend that the handling and presentation of this purported agreement constituted serious misrepresentation and misconduct, raising questions of fraud upon the court. AND THIS TIME, THERE IS A DOCUMENTARY TRAIL. Emails. Competing documents. Transmission records. Electronic metadata. Evidence that I contend establishes what I authorized, what was changed, and how the disputed order came before the court. These allegations are NOW SQUARELY BEFORE THE COURT. Following a five-hour divorce trial, a contested decree was signed on March 31, 2026, the same day my attorney was permitted to withdraw. Since then, I have been fighting through state, appellate, and federal proceedings to protect my property rights and secure meaningful judicial review. AND NOW LOOK WHERE WE ARE. Today is October 10, 2026. My home is scheduled for a FORECLOSURE AUCTION ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026. In just 24 days, I face losing my home and potentially nearly HALF A MILLION DOLLARS that I personally invested in it. The exact foreclosure risk I warned my attorney about more than a year ago is now at my doorstep. I DID NOT REFUSE TO SELL MY HOME. I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING TO SELL IT WITHOUT SURRENDERING MY PROPERTY RIGHTS AND EQUITY UNDER A DISPUTED ORDER. First came an ex parte proceeding involving allegations of suicidality and demands for extraordinary control. Then came an allegedly agreed order that I maintain I never authorized. Then came a disputed divorce decree. And now comes the prospect of irreversible financial destruction before the allegations surrounding these proceedings have been fully adjudicated. AN ATTORNEY’S LICENSE IS NOT IMMUNITY FROM THE LAW. A JUDGE’S SIGNATURE DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE DUTY TO EXAMINE CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF MISREPRESENTATION. And the word “AGREED” on a court order cannot substitute for actual consent. Fraud on the court is a serious legal allegation, and the evidence must be examined under the applicable legal standards. THE COURTS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON NOTICE. THE DOCUMENTS AND METADATA EXIST. THE FORECLOSURE DATE IS NOVEMBER 3 Less than 3 weeks from today ‼️#familycourtcorruption #fraudonthecourt #foreclosure #judicialaccountability #misrepresentation