Y𒋝ra

▶

▶ 4.4K ❤ 0 💬 0

“Der große Mogul! Ein ungeleckter Bär!” - The Great Mughal! An unlicked bear! This is how Beethoven was seen in the eyes of his time: a figure too large for the salons, an indomitable spirit amidst the etiquette of the nobility. The words oscillated between praise and bewilderment, extolling his almost mythical stature and, simultaneously, denouncing his rejection of the status quo, as he would say. Beethoven emerged as something raw and sovereign, majestic without a crown and fierce without submission. This rebellious nature was not limited to his personality and therefore permeated his music and his worldview, deeply connected to the political and philosophical transformations that Europe was experiencing in his century. As a demonstration that his art also reflected this historical moment, Beethoven decided to dedicate one of his greatest works to Napoleon Bonaparte. An admirer of the ideals of the French Revolution, the composer saw in the French general the promise of the modern hero, a man who did not rule by divine right, but by reason, by freedom, and by breaking with the old order. In the score of Symphony No. 3, he wrote a long and honorable dedication to the then First Consul of France. But the myth crumbled the moment Napoleon crowned himself emperor. The enchantment, however, did not last. Upon learning that Napoleon had proclaimed himself emperor, Beethoven reacted with fury. For him, the gesture symbolized an irreversible betrayal of the ideals of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. According to his assistant, Ferdinand Ries, the composer exclaimed: “So he is nothing but an ordinary man! Now he too will trample on all human rights, satisfying only his own will; now he will place himself above all other men, thus becoming a tyrant and nothing more!” After saying these words, Beethoven quickly ran to the table where Symphony No. 3 was and crossed out Napoleon's name from the cover with such force and brutality that the paper tore. Besides removing the Frenchman's name, he also discarded the dedication he had written in honor of the revolutionary leader. After these changes, Symphony No. 3 became known as the "Eroica Symphony." This, like other episodes, clearly reveals a fundamental trait of the composer: his profound intolerance of any form of submission, whether political, social, or symbolic. The same spirit that led him to break with Napoleon also shaped his stance towards the European aristocracy. Not by chance, years later, this attitude would reappear in another famous situation. In 1812, during a walk with the writer and poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, they both crossed paths with the Austrian Empress. Goethe, respectful of court conventions, stopped and bowed. Beethoven, in contrast, turned his back on him and continued walking with deliberate disdain. The gesture marked the definitive break between the two. Where Goethe saw authority and tradition, Beethoven saw only empty hierarchy. As Igor Stravinsky wrote: “Beethoven, that plebeian genius who proudly turned his back on emperors, princes, and magnates, is the Beethoven we love for his unwavering optimism, his manly sadness, the inspired pathos of his struggle, and the iron will that allowed him to seize destiny by the throat.” #beethoven #music #classical #napoleon

▶

▶ 3.2K ❤ 0 💬 0

When elevated above the common murmur, the word ceases to be an instrument and becomes an army of ideas summoning multitudes to fulfill them. There are speeches that do not limit themselves to communicating concepts but they found realities. An almost fantastic theater. Ancient Emperors, through the art of the word and this fantastic theater. Demosthenes, cadence shaped the destiny of the polis. The word is an invisible weapon. A sonic architecture erected. Solid music in the instant of the voice directed to disarmed consciences, to multitudes eager for meaning, ready to incorporate as their own the ideas offered to them with persuasion and absolute conviction. The orator never is, never was merely a man who spoke, he was a point of convergence where the diffuse tensions of a collectivity found form, direction, and impetus. In the last century, the men of their own century had the choreography of power, the art of war, calculated silence, with an arm raised as if pulling their own destiny down. Hypnosis. The mass ceased to be a sum of individuals and became a single body. There was a dramatic progression, a tonal ascension, almost a liturgical climax. The oratory took on almost mystical contours. They embodied the very narrative they proclaimed. Each gesture was a sign with each pause a promise, each verbal outburst, a call to collective destiny #history #targetaudience #politics #fyp #zionism

▶

▶ 2.3K ❤ 0 💬 0

Like a smooth surface onto which expectations are projected, It’s curious to see how we idealize the future. Perhaps that’s why change is so disruptive for some; it shows that the future doesn’t present itself as a disciplined continuation of our own idealizations. And that’s why we anxiously imagine it, believe it. Faith in it. Certainly not because it’s somehow true, but because living without any form of anticipation would make the days excessively transparent #philosophy #fyp #history