After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime

After the jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has now publicly asked President Trump to consider pardoning her. But there’s a major problem with that request: this is a Massachusetts state case, and a presidential pardon generally does not apply to state criminal charges. So what happens now? Prosecutors still have to decide whether they will pursue a retrial. 👀 September 29 could be an important day in this case. What do YOU think should happen next? #LindsayClancy #crimetok #truecrime #TrialTok

This was one of the most talked-about moments from Lindsay Clancy’s return to court. Kevin Reddington stood before Judge Sullivan and argued that the Commonwealth never actually proved Lindsay killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt. “Where is the evidence that she did this?” He challenged the prosecution’s timeline, questioned the investigation, and argued that the entire case was based on speculation. And yes… this is a VERY different argument to hear after spending weeks at trial focusing heavily on postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility. I’m posting his full argument in 2 parts so you can hear EXACTLY what was said and make up your own mind. 👇 WATCH PART 1 and tell me: Do you think this argument changes anything about how you view the case?#LindsayClancy #crimetok #KevinReddington #truecrime

This is where his argument gets REALLY interesting. He goes after the investigation, the timeline, the physical evidence, the DNA, the fingerprints, and even the medical evidence surrounding the timeline of events. His argument? The Commonwealth had the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt and he says they didn’t. Listen to his argument in his own words and then tell me what YOU think. 👀 Because this case is FAR from over. Is Reddington making a convincing argument… or do you think the evidence speaks for itself? #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #crimetok #truecrime